REPORT HEARING COMMITTEE ON V On December 9, 2009 the hearing was held at the territory of the Region V Committee Lombardia councilor transport.
Here were exhibited the Councillor reasons for the choice of performing the work without explaining what will be mitigated to make the work less impact the project (perhaps moderating these works there will ????).
In summary the points made were as follows (in red carry a personal comment):
1. The work is useful because it will increase the rail transport.
What rail transport is not good no one has ever thought, certain that if not cut in half our homes might be even better. DO NOT RUSH would be great and rethink this (underground line in the trenches etc) so I also realize the territory (the work will not last 6 months as the expo but will remain for at least 2 or 3 generations) and not only the immediate problem (see EXPO 2015).
2. The third and fourth track was requested by local government and none of these being preliminary meetings (the last in the month of April 2009) has never opposed the plan (except the municipality of Vanzago) opposing criticism of all ' impact for residents, and indeed have proved very favorable.
Apparently our Mayor did not consider the damage to the city (with a project well done), or thought that the tracks were made in who knows how. What we can not imagine it: the current causes the disappearance of two routes.
3. The noise barriers would be performed in any case to resolve a situation of unbearable noise.
We have no reason to think otherwise, but we believe it is a little different than having a 4-5 m to 0.5m.
4. All observations have been reported to work RFI which confirmed that these changes cost and without additional funding this work can not be achieved. To date, more funds are not there.
We are told that the necessary works are mitigated, floors damping to reduce vibration and noise barriers different then there are not any money to make.
5. Much of the project has been misinterpreted especially given the short distance scale of the drawing, the situation will improve with the drawings made with a larger scale.
do not know if laugh about it, one thing is certain before long I'll see the real distances from the truth and I can judge my ability to read drawings and Technicians.
6. The law does not provide for compensation for damaged, are required but there may be only if there will be no additional funding.
I understand you do not have a euro and you need the value of my house to carry out the work.
7. there Landfill are the time and money to do it. The work would cost about 100 million more.
The figure is the same as estimated by Italferr to expropriate all the homes in the line contained within a distance of 10 m.
Then the landfill does not cost that much! Costa expropriate all damaged and is to have a decent life.
not comment further, I believe that what is written speaks for itself.
